What Is the Difference between CFD and Binary Options ...

The case for Ethereum: general-purpose vs special-purpose blockchains

Bitcoin and Alt-coins are Special-Purpose Chains

What's the difference between a general-purpose blockchain and a special-purpose blockchain? Let's start with bitcoin, the original special-purpose chain for computing and comparing sha256 hashes. Bitcoin users started the chain by mining on generic x86 (general-purpose) CPUs. But because sha256 hashing is a specific computation, btc mining is now dominated by Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) hardware. Litecoin is another special-purpose chain, except it computes scrypt hashes (some manufacturers are already started shipping scrypt ASIC miners). There's also a Primecoin for computing prime numbers, and a bunch of other special-purpose chains commonly known as alt-coins.

Special-Purpose Chains: Backend and User Perspective

How does it work when we want to use the services provided by separate special-purpose chains? Let's look at the granddaddy of alt-coins, namecoin, which like bitcoin uses sha256 hashes. Additionally, it also provides some standard namecoin script opcodes for associating plaintext pseudonyms with unique addresses (public/private keypairs), so namecoin addresses can register and "own" domain names or identities/handles. Let's say you want to use bitcoins to purchase a namecoin .bit domain that its owner is selling. What does it take to get these two special-purpose blockchains (bitcoin and namecoin) to interact with each other? The immediate option (and the only one available today) is a centralized service running a web server in front of both p2p daemons (as nodes of their respective networks, bitcoind and namecoind). That centralized service is a BTC/NMC exchange, and maybe it has an interface allowing you to register "dot-bit" names (otherwise you'd have to open up two separate wallets - one for each coin). The centralized exchange is a trusted third-party that holds in escrow the BTC and NMC of each user (whose coins could be stolen by a dishonest exchange operator).

A General-Purpose Chain: Backend and User Perspective

So how is using a unified general-purpose chain different from a special-purpose one? On the Ethereum general-purpose chain, each service is provided by some "DApp" (distributed app "hosted" by all ethereum miners). A DApp is an interface to a specific "contract", running at some address on the blockchain. For instance, to register a name, you would open the EtherNames DApp in the ethereum client's built-in browser, type in the name you want to register, and "send" the registration as a transaction with data. There's no need to copy and paste addresses since the Ethereum client provides hooks for seamless wallet access inside every DApp. The registration transaction is sent to the EtherName DApp's contract address, which is running some variant of the namecoin contract code. A specific contract gets initialized at a particular address by some untrusted third-party individual/entity (the DApp author). The contract author is not trusted, all the author does is upload the contract code and pay the initial "gas" fee. The contract code is independently executed and verified by each ethereum miner as part of a single atomic transaction. Atomicity means that the ledger database updates are all-or-nothing, so no user has to worry about the risk of having to pay first because any and all transactions needed to fulfill a contract are guaranteed to occur within the same block, or the contract is broken and won't run at all. Think of Ethereum contracts as interconnected threads in a big web of complex multi-sig transactions of Ethers and contract-specific sub-currencies, all of which run atop the same unified blockchain.

Special-Purpose Chains: Developer Perspective

From the developer's perspective, operating a service that uses two separate special-purpose chains requires maintaining both blockchains (upgrading separate software, providing enough processing power, disk space, and bandwidth for each chain). It also requires maintaining user accounts, as well as wallets on two separate chains (multiplied by the number of users). Hosting a server is needed to run both the namecoin daemon and bitcoin daemon (unless outsourced to a centralized API). The web developer will need to maintain a web server and app stack such as LAMP (Linux Apache Mysql Php) or MEAN (Mongodb Express Angular Node). Finally, the service must hold the users' deposits of bitcoins and namecoins in secure hot wallets and offline cold storage, keeping them safe from hacker thieves. Altogether, every service operator needs to independently maintain a separate full-stack system, which can be a herculean effort.

A General-Purpose Chain: Developer Perspective

A service operating on Ethereum has a DApp backend hosted right on the blockchain, maintained by miners (who earn gas fees). A developer simply authors the contract code and pays the gas fee to initialize it on the blockchain, which is much easier than forking an alt-coin to start yet another genesis block. DApp's do not need a separate API for access and integration by other developers; authors just name functions inside a contract, directly exposing an API (with optional fee-per-use) that enables message calls from any other Ethereum DApp. Also, DApp authors do not need to maintain user accounts, since the users interact with the DApp directly on the blockchain through their ethereum addresses. Nor do DApp authors need to maintain user wallets since private keys stay private in a decentralized system. Unlike the current convention where coins are deposited to a wallet address controlled by some third-party, in a truly decentralized system private keys are only used for signing transactions as inputs to contracts.

Meta-Coins as Feature Specs

Meta-coin protocol extensions like Colored Coins, MasterCoin, and CounterParty work by organizing a group of users who agree to interpret bitcoin transaction data according to some metadata specification, supplementing the base rules of the bitcoin protocol. For example, MasterCoin specifies creating multisig 1-of-n bitcoin transactions and encoding data in the n-minus-1 unused public keys. In the meta-coin approach, each feature or "contract" is specified in the meta-protocol. Two MasterCoin features are registration of a data stream and the creation of a sub-currency, these are baked into the specification and reference client alongside the other features. While you can register new data streams and sub-currencies, if you want to create a new contract that is some kind of a hybrid between a data stream and a sub-currency, such as a call/put option or a Contract For Difference (CFD), it would need to be implemented directly in the reference client, and unlocked as a feature at some future block number. Implementing new features in a meta-coin protocol that doesn't have a scripting language requires specifying them directly in the protocol and must be effected at the organizational level.

Scripts and DApps vs Forks and Features

Embedding a scripting language into a crypto-currency gives it the same kind of extensibility that gamers crave in video games. Scripts empower players to create "mods" and customize their game-world with new levels, characters, and maps. In the crypto-currency world, scripting allows for the extension of a plethora of decentralized features such as trading, lotteries, and ecommerce, all atop a shared, compatible platform. Bitcoin has a scripting language, but with severe limitations including: lack of loops, binary state variables limited to spent or unspent transaction outputs, and blockchain blindness. The difficulty of using bitcoin script has in effect given rise to a landscape of competing alt-coins and meta-coins with incompatible protocols. The preferable route, and vision of Ethereum, is to foster a fully-featured ecosystem of compatible, interacting DApps. Providing a Turing-complete scripting language on a general-purpose blockchain with message calls between contracts stimulates adoption of Ethereum as a shared decentralized Operating System and kernel.

Decentralized House, Decentralized Dealer

Consider the concept of a decentralized lottery. In a semi-decentralized lottery that is merely provably fair, although the operator is not capable of altering any particular dice outcome, he can simply shut down the service immediately after a big winning bet comes in, scamming the user of his money and winnings. But in a fully decentralized lottery, the mechanism for distributing the winnings is written into the contract itself (open-source and audited by users), so no central operator is needed. While writing such a contract in bitcoin script is theoretically possible (see pages 12-15), to my knowledge none has been implemented. In practice, it is easier to create a LottoCoin as a special-purpose alt-chain. In contrast, writing a script on the Ethereum platform for a fully decentralized lottery is not only feasible but relatively easy.

Conclusion

The limitations and difficulties of using bitcoin script to implement decentralized features natively on the bitcoin blockchain has resulted in a fragmented ecosystem of incompatible, competing alt-chains and meta-coins. While it is theoretically possible to use bitcoin script for complex contracts like cross-chain atomic trading, practical implementations of such features have yet to be achieved (to my knowledge). On the other hand, Ethereum focuses on providing an easy-to-use scripting language for implementing advanced contracts on a general-purpose blockchain. Ethereum's extensible platform enables the realization of advanced decentralized features that previously were inaccessible.
submitted by martinBrown1984 to ethereum [link] [comments]

Binäre Optionen Forum - CFD's vs Furures FOREX VS BINARY OPTIONS 2020! - YouTube QUIT BINARY OPTIONS AND START FOREX?  WHICH ONE SHOULD I CHOOSE? THE TRUTH ABOUT BINARY OPTIONS - YouTube TRADING SZENE GESCHOCKT? ESMA: Binäre Optionen VERBOT - CFD und FOREX Regulation Darum sind Binäre Optionen ÜBERFLÜSSIG - Binäre Optionen vs CFDs Binäre Optionen vs. CFDs - Unterschiede und Besonderheiten binäre optionen oder cfd - vor und nachteile legal

CFDs vs Options – Difference Between CFDs and Options. CFDs and options bear a number of similarities, but also a number of key differences, and both are suited to their own particular purposes. Unlike share dealing, where traders are engaging in the underlying asset, options are also derivative instruments which in themselves are naturally leveraged. That said, there are several notable ... Binary Options vs CFD – Which should I Trade? In Business 19 July 2017 16 May 2020 Business Matters. There’s a lot that needs to be weighed up when deciding what sort of financial vehicle to invest in. You need to consider suitability to your trading style, potential profit, risk, and how well it fits the rest of your portfolio. CFDs and Binary Options have a lot of similarities, being ... Binary vs CFD - The Pros And Cons. Updated Jun, 2020 Category - Guides 40 Views Today. When choosing whether to trade in binary options or CFDs, there are some things to consider. From the costs of trading to payouts and losses you also need to give some thought to the type of instrument that is suitable for you. Choosing the correct instrument requires you to understand the differences ... CFD’s and binary options are similar in the following ways: They are derivatives: it is not necessary to own the underlying asset to trade in the asset. They have short trading periods: for both binary options and CFDs, traders can select trading periods from one hour to a week depending on their business objectives. Predicting the movement of prices: both trading instruments involve making ... Hedging: CFD’s offer those with equity portfolios the opportunity to quickly and cheaply hedge their long equity positions. Options can be a daunting and difficult to structure, especially if you’re using them to hedge positions. CFD’s give savvy traders a cheap alternative and a variety of hedging opportunities. Cons: Binary options vs. CFD are different but also have some similarities. Read this guide about the critical aspects of each type of instrument to learn about their benefits and drawbacks. Knowing the pros and cons of binary options vs. CFD will help you choose the right one. Payouts and Losses in Trading . With binary options, it is much easier to predict payouts and losses than with CFDs. The ... To Conclude CFD vs Binary Options. Both CFD vs binary options trading are quite similar in terms of the derivative form been that of a binary nature. However in our opinion binary options is a better choice instead of CFD due to the above mentioned facts. Furthermore binary options has increasing investment opportunities in terms of asset selection. Additionally the clear knowledge of payouts ... However, options are generally considered to be a less risky instrument because they have an inherent, ‘real world’ value beyond that of the CFD, despite the fact that they are intrinsically more complicated instruments to understand and execute sensibly. So, for experienced traders in certain situations, options may well represent a better reward-to-risk ratio than comparative CFD trades. Contracts for difference (CFD) and binary options are some of the most popular trading instruments available to online traders.This article will show you the difference and similarities between CFDs and binary options, so you can determine the most appropriate instruments for your trading needs. Binary Options vs CFD: Controlling Profit. In Binary Options your profit and loss are not affected by the distance that price travelled from your entry. One pip is all you need to win or lose a trade but the payout will be the same even if price travelled 50, 100 or 1,000 pips because in Binary Options you are either right or wrong, it doesn’t matter by how much. With CFDs the story is ...

[index] [26540] [14662] [8413] [18597] [29069] [12659] [5221] [14499] [817] [11950]

Binäre Optionen Forum - CFD's vs Furures

This video is unavailable. Watch Queue Queue 💰💲FULL BEGINNER? Join My PERSONAL TRAINING!💴💵 BLW Trading Academy: http://www.blwtradingacademy.com/ Live Trading Signals HERE!🔙💲💹Join My ... binäre optionen oder cfd - vor und nachteile legal http://bitlye.com/7k7yHv Treten Sie uns bei und werden Sie reich mit der Crypto Trader! WERDEN SIE BITC... Disclaimer: As per CFTC Rules, U.S Traders should not trade Binary Options. Investing in CFD involves a level of risk, which is why potential or total loss can be a result of mismanagement of our ... Die Unterschiede von CFDs, Binäre Optionen, Forex, Aktien, Futures - Duration: 15:40. Koko Petkov 29,408 views. 15:40. Best Binary Options Strategy 2020 - 2 Minute Strategy LIVE TRAINING ... Binäre Optionen Forum - Einstieg in den Forex handel Part 2 Der unserer Meinung nach beste Broker: Anmeldung mit 100% Bonus ? http://option.go2jump.org/SH17G... Are binary options a good idea? If you're thinking about trading binary options, watch this video first. Check out our FREE training for traders https://bi... Binäre Optionen und CFDs sind Hebelprodukte, mit denen es möglich ist, sowohl von steigenden als auch fallenden Kursen des Basiswertes zu verdienen. Dennoch unterscheiden sich beide Produkte in ...

http://binary-optiontrade.paawahighpenvernra.cf